“Nonviolence is the answer to the crucial political and moral questions of our time- the need for people to overcome oppression…Nonviolence is not sterile passivity but a powerful moral force which makes for social transformation”- Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
In recent postings I attempted to define what capitalism is. Most of my previous postings consisted of laying out arguments for what I believe to be a system that would be far better than capitalism: economic democracy. An important issue that needs to be addressed at this time is a detail about changing the system: the necessity of nonviolence.
First, it’s delusional to think that it’s possible to change America through violence. Joseph Stack’s attack on an IRS building in Austin, Texas was a nothing more than cowardly act of evil. All it did was terrorize the hard working government employees in the building and murdering an American hero, Vernon Hunter, 67, who was laid to rest with full military honors.
Even if there was a remote possibility, which there isn’t, of success by such means what would a change by violence show from an ethical standpoint? Do we really want a system changed by violent means? Benjamin Franklin wrote, “Whatever is begun in anger ends in shame.”
Then there is a purely patriotic reason. Rev Norman Thomas once said, “If you want a symbolic gesture, don't burn the flag; wash it." The drive to change America from a capitalist system to an economic democracy should come from a sense of true patriotism in which, out of love, we hope to “wash” our nation of the wrongs that exist rather than burn it.
It’s also important that as we write and discuss concepts such as class, and toss around terms such as “capitalists” or “workers”, that we avoid demonizing any one person or group of people. In all socio-economic classes there are individuals who are morally good and morally bad. Being a laborer doesn’t make one a saint nor does being a capitalist make one a villain. We need to emphasis that it’s the degrading and dehumanizing system of creating dominating relationships based on capital and the private control of marketable wealth that we strive against and not the individuals within the system. If we begin to demonize people then we run the risk of creating “The Other”, which often leads to violence.
A brief comment is needed here about the efficacy of nonviolent methods. Some, especially on the radical Left, claim that nonviolence is weak and ineffective. They point to all of the past changes in the modes of production and that they all were the result of violent means. What they fail to consider is that all of the prior changes occurred prior to the development of the modern democratic state. It’s the power of parliamentary, democratic institutions that has since shown to be the key to a modern peaceful transition.
On a summer day in 1963, standing on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, Dr King said, “In the process of gaining our rightful place, we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred. We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline.” The only choice available to us is a dedication to the use of peaceful, democratic, and parliamentary procedures. We won’t give up our right to protest and publicly demand change but our chosen means will be peaceful. We owe this to our ancestors, to our descendants, and to the nation that we love.
2 comments:
I appreciate your economic development model based on peace and equality. Similar model was developed by an economist-vice chancellor of Indian university in 1993. It has the following basic economic theories:
1. self-employment (no unemployment)
2.Retaining full surplus value with worker-cum-entrepreneur either himself or in cooperative or partnership firms of working people.
3.support by state in terms of interest-free loans, technology. training, infrastructure etc. at no cost or reasonable cost.
omnipotent state to ensure no interference of coercive agents in market place in supplies and demands and prices.
4.true free market system (not like the one we see in capitalist economic system, which is monopoly market system in reality).
5. Totally peaceful and democratic and decentralized economic development as visualized by Mahatma Gandhi.
This is called Hindu-economics since the basic concepts are based on ethos of Hindu civilization in ancient Indian times. This new economic development alternative model was presented to the world in 1993 by the author Dr. M G Bokare. It is just opposite of scarcity economics. The basic concept of this alternative model is of abundance of supplies of goods and services.
The book (second edition) is now available from http://www.pothi.com
DG Bokare,
I found your comments very interesting. Thank you so much for posting about this. The book looks very like one that we all should read.
I very much appreciate you reading my blog and your comments.
Larry
Post a Comment